The Killing of Mockingbirds.
Okay.
I’m mad now.
Various writer’s blogs are hitting a ‘why bother’ note.
M.G. observes during a book sale at the library that many of the works sold off at bargain basement prices are quality literature. Books that probably didn’t generate enough interest. I can relate to that, having recently seeing the book ‘Fugitive Pieces’ being sold off for a mere buck at the Almonte Public Library.
Elsewhere in the blogosphere Forest, Bernita and Brown Trout decide to forgo seeking out an agent/publisher and to just self-publish, or indeed, just ‘write for themselves’.
Well fuck that, guys. And I’ll tell you why…
At this moment I am actively reading three books.
The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
(both versions – the very naughty version and the less inflammatory version)
Watership Down by Richard Adams
And…
Wait for it…
Love’s Tender Fury by Jennifer Wilde (Not related to Oscar)
Let’s start with the uber-trashy romance, shall we?
Some might remember Jennifer Wilde’s spritely Trollop/Heroine, Marietta Danvers. This spunky, red-headed vixen stuttered in mock outrage/modesty as she slept her way though copius ‘true love’s in at least 3 novels. Shamelessness coupled with unabashed sluttiness took Marietta from England to the colonies, back across Europe and Russia, and no doubt heavily lined the pockets of Jennifer Wilde, ‘her’ agent and ‘her’ publishers quite nicely.
Literature?
No.
Entertaining?
Hell YES!
Oscar Wilde wrote for money. He constantly lived a caviar lifestyle on a burger budget. This did not stop him from writing some of the finest work in the English language. At the time, Oscar was regarded as a fop and a joke, and sent on tour in the US and Canada as a publicity stunt to promote another’s work. Oscar turned the attention to his advantage, built a following and while on tour he wrote his only novel - which he heavily re-edited after the first edition shocked his Victorian audience. He removed some of the seamier bits and added a few chapters, but he did not add the obligatory moral at the end.
He had his limits.
Literature?
Yes.
Entertaining?
Yes, but now rather dated, unlike some of his finer poems and plays.
Bear with me here, folks…
Now, I asked this question a while ago.
What sort of writer do you want to be?
Not one of you stated the obvious.
There are no limits to what you can write, except the ones you put upon yourself.
No one forces you to stay within a genre. There is no shadowy figure lurking, ready to leap upon you to revoke your artistic license if you write a short WESTERN NOIR, and then write a ROMANCE novel, and then submit an essay on the themes currently prevailing in FANTASY.
Hello?
There are no rules.
Keep this in mind as I talk about ‘Watership Down’.
A tale about rabbits. Not adorable, fluffy, Thumper-esque Disney sort of rabbits, but a group of pragmatic rodents with a distinctive culture and moral code of their own.
Deceptively simple, brilliant, entertaining and literate, the resounding success for ‘Watership Down’ surprised everyone - especially the author.
Like William Goldman’s ‘Princess Bride’, ‘Watership Down’ initially was a story told by a father on a long drive to entertain his daughters. One night, while reading a dismal bedtime story to his daughters, Adams threw the book aside and declared (As so many of us have) “Good Lord, I could write better than that myself!”
And then Richard Adams did what some only talk about. He sat down and wrote the story he made up about the rabbits that his daughers loved so. He wrote it in bits, in the evenings, instead of watching TV (see Barry Eilser’s blog on how TV is a time-suck). Adam’s daughters read it, made suggestions and then Adams consulted an expert on rabbits and altered the story so that while Hazel and the other rabbits could talk and reason, they behaved like proper rabbits.
Despite the fact that Adams wrote Watership Down for his daughters, he knocked on a lot of agent’s and publisher’s doors. He refused to alter the draft to ‘suit’ much younger children or much older children. The rejection notices piled up. He noticed a small publisher had reprinted a book called ‘Wood Magic’ by Richard Jeffries and felt they might find his book worth a look.
They did. They published it.
Cue the rave reviews, fan letters from all ages, etc…
Watership Down hasn’t been out of print since. But if Richard Adams had given up, self-published and claimed he “wrote it for himself” and just left it at that, then his daughters would still have his book true… but the rest of us wouldn’t.
And that would be a sin.
Yanno?
Like killing mockingbirds.
Your call.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
Nicely put. Stay on them. Nearly all of us commenting, complaining, and talking, are clearly capable of writing the book and selling it.
And most of this writing is so superior to much that is actually GETTING published, it is only having the perseverence necessary to follow through.
Whenever you read something and think, "Shit, I can do better than this." or "My stuff is great compared to this crap.", remember you're reading these blogs because you know how to write, and you're here for help in getting it to a wider audience.
All right, all fucking right, Ann. God Dammnit, now tell me how to do it without stressing out over the perceived pressure, the constant worry about getting rejection slips, the agony of not having enough money to send copies off to agents or publishers, the constant battle to remain positive in the face of constant negativity...the stress that's deadly for me.
Or at least tell me how to rearrange my head so my natural side-effect of paranoia doesn't overwhelm what little intestinal fortitude I may have.
And I copied out this post to keep on my disk. So you said something somehow that echoed in my head. Now all I gotta do is follow-through, although I don't know how.
I've been blogging and trying to learn to write well just since January.
This is the best post I have read on "being a writer."
Hey, hey, you pin-up, you!
I didn't decide to "forego" anything - I just sympathized with Forrest's feelings because I have occasionally felt the same.
Reception's been pretty positive so far.
Great post, though.
Yay! It is so freakin' great to finally hear someone giving the kick-in-the-pants rant that so many of us need to hear. Thank you, thank you, thank you from a writer who's determined to get published & glad to hear she's not alone.
Don't do it!
I gave up on what is probably still my best work to date and self-pubbed rather than continuing to go through rejection/revision. Now I wish I'd kept looking for an agent or publisher, kept rewriting when all the rejections seemed to point out the same problem. Now what do I do with a book that's been published first by a POD outfit and then again by me? I'd still like to see it published by a "real" publisher, and now I fear that I've given it a premature funeral.
If you want to be a writer, go for the gold. Keep submitting. Keep rewriting. Rework it until it shines, and submut until either it's published or the post office runs out of stamps.
Never surrender!
Bless you, E. Ann.
With the advice of two mentors, one a well-respected author with several books to his credit and the other a former publishing house editor, I tried to hammer my first book proposal into the mold of narrative military history. But that isn't, and never was, the book I craved to write. So, what have I done with my finely-honed book proposal for the past three years?
Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Never sent a single query out.
You've reinforced M.G.'s advice to me. Forget the military history and write the book I intended in the first place, which will presumably be a wiser book having gone through this agonizing process.
I'm printing out this post and hanging it by my computer as a reminder.
Now see what you've done, Liz! All over the world trees are groaning under the agonizing loss of fellow trees, so that a myriad of writers can print out your post to stick beside their computer...
Good job!
Liz, this is fantastic. Ah, I knew in the midst of my turbulent no-water weekend, I was missing something.
If you think that it's frustrating getting rejection letters, wait until you invest the energy, time, money into self publishing and still have no readers.
I won't start on this trip. I know what some can think - I've got a contract, I get money from my publisher, I pay nothing for the privilege of seeing my book come out.
But I earned that, and if I can do it, so can you. Sometimes, a no isn't a no, but a not ready yet and there are things in that you should listen to. Seriously. Because as much as editors and agents will have different opinions, I have learned from rejection letters, and learned how to improve, and learned about the market. Editors and agents know about the market, and if they aren't certain something can sell, you have to consider at least one thing:
You failed to sell the idea to them.
So what makes you think you can sell it to the buying public?
It's a learning curve. Every feedback rejection letter I've gotten has produced more changes, and made me a stronger writer for it. Don't discount the value of that.
whoa!
I sent my dad home with glen's book, which i'd found in that bin- The Snowman's Children.
he stayed up to read a third of it last night. Told me it was well-written and interesting and thank you. He took it with him.
I'm not ready to toss in any towels yet. More determined than ever to see my quirky way of writing get it's shot.
And here I thought "The Killing of Mockingbirds" was gonna be another installment of JA's. Shame on me. Good post, EA.
"Never surrender."
That sound like passion.
I had applied that motto to chasing someone who didn't want me for sure, not fully realizing that after tweny years it might just be over. I was involved in a triangle.
Just at the point of giving up,I learned that the duo in my a' trois--broke up.
Victory.
And now man and woman are too old and feeble to give much of a damn anyway.
I did write a novel about it, The Fire In Bradford,was lucky enough to have a drinking companion who happened to be a printer and his office ran off some books that eventually made money, resulting in a review in my local paper.
Well, I didn't entirely win the girl, but I somehow won the book.
I suppose the killer instinct (writing instinct?) takes many forms.
When you're in your own novel, someting else takes over.
The bird-headed Egyptian god of writing?
Spook!
Self published does not mean you can't have a book. You want the book, go to the vendor and buy. Don't matter if it was self published. Anybody can find a book on the net if they want. Your only concern during this era of publishing is "Is it any good?" That's all your concern should be, not whether it was self published. All this post did, by commenting on self published in a negative aspect, is forward the old rule's monopoly on unpublished manuscripts. The monopoly needs to die.
All this post did, by commenting on self published in a negative aspect, is forward the old rule's monopoly on unpublished manuscripts. The monopoly needs to die.
Why, Ann! How terribly un-PC of you.
Monopoly must die! But not before I score Park Place and Boardwalk.
As soon as the internet came along, and allowed anyone to publish anything at will, there was no monopoly.
Watership Down is beyond compare.
It is without a doubt my favorite book.
One of the few books I will read again and again and again.
The Hobbit is another one - but Watership Down is my favorite of all books, anywhere.
Sad - I know...
But true.
Bigwig, Fiver, Hazel - they are emotional creatures that pull on my emotions so easily - where I'm a hardcore vampire fan - LOL!
Hugs to ya!
Lady M
Post a Comment